Assessment And Care Provision Of Mrs. Amalie Jones

Assessment and Care Provision of Mrs.Amalie Jones. This essay about 89 year old Mrs Amalie Jones will be a discussion of assessment and care provision identified through the concept map in assessment one.Concepts from Miller’s Functional Consequences Theory of healthy ageing will be used to identify the risk factors which negatively impacts on her function,safety and independence. Focus of this essay will be demonstrating how the dignity of the client/patient can be maintained through dignified nursing care. The main purpose of this assessment will be to protomote both problem solving and care provision including prioritising.According to Miller’s Functional Theory, not all the health issues are due to age related changes, lot of them are a result of risk factors. These can be addressed and even prevented. Nurses play a big role in the prevention of such problems.Amelie Jones has few age related problems such as Macular Degeneration , Arthritis and risk factors due to lifestyle such as Hypothyroidism, risk of fall, wei ght loss and depression. Nursing interventions will be person-centred and ethical. Mrs Amalie Jones is an 89 year old widow. She lives alone and had to give up on lot of things of her interest due to arthritis pain. Recently she developed macular degeneration and had to give up driving affecting her independence. She rarely leaves the house as she has difficulty with mobility with her health issues. Due to these reasons she has lost contact with most of her

Future Of Feminism Evolutionary Economics - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Future Of Feminism Evolutionary Economics. Answer: Introduction: The Chronicle of Higher Education published back in the year 1993, triggered the feminism in economics at first place and since then it has been almost two decades, when debates stared to redefine around the introduction of feminism in economics (Nelson, 1995). One of the key objectives of the feminist economists is to submerge the andocentric biases rather than gaining economic preference over the male dominated world. On the other hand, evolutionary economics is one of the mainstream economic studies that focus on the growth of economy through evolutionary methodology (winter, 2014). This essay is aimed to discuss whether the evolutionary economics is regarded as the feminist approach by the feminist economists from the economic perspective or not on the ground of three varieties of feminist economics. Illustration: There is a common believe from the accounting perspective that, gender is subjected to the stereotyping on the economic job market, when it comes to women rather than academic performance, physical appearance and personal information is highly focused (Wu, 2017). Determining between the human psychology and economy is hard, however, earlier it has been stated by the various theses like Guardian Ethic and the Trade Ethic, child raising, hospitality service are the main service of the women. However, according to the House workers Handbook published in 1969, it has been stated that, though the women stay at home, they provide significantly to the GDP of the country by reproducing the means of production, which is labour (Ayalon Roziner, 2016). When it comes to the evolutionary economics, it is another mainstream economics that has been originated during the beginning of the 21st century, which explains the economy according to the theory of evolution. Evolutionary economics does not c onsider the equilibrium of the economy; rather it focuses on its transformation (Gintis, 2017). Discussion: Feminism and the evolutionary economies are the two different schools of economic thoughts, however both of them has been germinated during the beginning of the 21st century (Borrill Tesfatsion, 2011). Evolutionary economy focuses on the growth, competition, structural change and the resource constraint over the time, however when it comes to the feminism economies, then there are three varieties which are namely women economists, women in the economy and the gender values and economics (Nelson, 1995). Women economists: According to the general idea of feminism, men and women should have equality in all the treatment, respect, opportunities, social rights and belief and there should be no barriers in opportunities in depending upon the gender bias. Women economists argue that male centric society is the main or essential wellspring of mistreatment of women (Brenner, 2014). Moreover, women economic scholar affirms that there is a common believe that women cannot be free due to their monetary dependence on people in the social arena. Owing to uneven adjustment in the society, women are liable to the male rulers and from the accounting perspective of the feminist economy, women are absent from the national accounting system. Freedom of women are contained by the gender biasness in the economy and accounting perspective of feminism argue that freedom must be achieved through attempting to eradicate both the social and financial wellsprings of womens persecution (Taylor, 2016). Evolutionary economists consider the women economists view that has been originated during the Marxs idea of socialist economy; however, the feminism does not consider the Marxist theory of evolution. Women in the economy: According to the economic analysis to feminist issues, they strive for the equality without sexual biasness in legal, political and economical aspect of the society (Lindsey, 2015). Liberal feminism argues that the equality of women can only be achieved through the reform in the society and this has been supported by the evolutionary economy. Both school of economic though believes that if there is requirement of growth in the society, then it has to be augmented by the means of social reform. Accounting perspective of the feminism argue that change in society can lead to higher productivity, rise in aggregate demand and generation of more job opportunities that will inherently crowd out the disparity between the male and female of the society (Epure, 2014). Moreover, it has also been noted that, if high profile female economists are attached with the field of operation, then it gains higher amount of attention, which may be the possible outcome of gender biasness and the human psych ology. Thus, feminism does consider the evolutionary economics as the accounting perspective of feminism argue that growth of society can be enhanced by inclusion of women into the accounting system of the society (Rottenberg, 2014). Gender values and economics: Feminism and modern economics argues in favour of compete restructuring of the society and elimination of the gender from the society. According to the feminist theorizing about sexism and science, both men and women should have equal right from the accounting perspective, irrespective of the difference in sex (Nelson, 1995). Prevalent ideas as women are subject to reproduce the means of production and nursing the elderly people must be eradicated from the society (Mackay, 2015). Feminist economist argue that women should waved off from giving birth to the child, which will effectively give them free hand to work as much as the men and it will bring in the women into the accounting of the nation. This will bring in parity between men and women leading to better growth of society. However, both the evolutionary and feminist school of thought aligns with each other but the argument is vogue and this does not hold any ground (Wu, 2017). Conclusion: Above discussion clearly shows that the evolutionary economics largely align with the thoughts of the feminism. Both of the thoughts have been generated during the 21st century and both have some argument, when it comes to the growth of an economy. From the accounting perspective, elimination of the gender biasness will bring in the women into the accounting system of the nation. Thus, the feminist economists can certainly grant evolutionary economy as the feminist approach. Reference: Borrill, P. L., Tesfatsion, L. (2011). 11 Agent-based modeling: the right mathematics for the social sciences?.The Elgar companion to recent economic methodology,228. Brenner, J. (2014). 21st century Socialist-feminism.Socialist Studies/tudes Socialistes,10(1). Epure, M. (2014). Critically assess: the relative merits of liberal, socialist and radical feminism.Journal of Research in Gender Studies,4(2), 514. Gintis, H. (2017).A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences. United Sates of America: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.umass.edu/preferen/gintis/Unity-BBS%20Print%20Version.pdf Mackay, F. (2015).Radical feminism: Feminist activism in movement. Springer. Nelson, J. A. (1995). Feminism and economics.The Journal of Economic Perspectives,9(2), 131-148. Rottenberg, C. (2014). The rise of neoliberal feminism.Cultural studies,28(3), 418-437. Taylor, B. (2016). 19 Socialist Feminism: Utopian or Scientific?.People's History and Socialist Theory (Routledge Revivals), 158. Winter, S. G. (2014). The future of evolutionary economics: can we break out of the beachhead?.Journal of Institutional Economics,10(4), 613-644. Wu, A. H. (2017). Gender stereotyping in academia: Evidence from economics job market rumors forum. Ayalon, L., Roziner, I. (2016). Satisfaction with the relationship from the perspectives of family caregivers, older adults and their home care workers.Aging mental health,20(1), 56-64. Lindsey, L. L. (2015).Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Routledge.